Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 South Texas earthquake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 21:58, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 South Texas earthquake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS and that this has an articel here 2010 Texas earthquake which is also up for deletion, so this may in fact be a fork. There appears to be no reason why this eqarthquake is more notable then any other magnitude 4.0 in Texas or elsewhere Slatersteven (talk) 12:48, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The other AFD is here. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:25, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as above and discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Texas earthquake. noq (talk) 13:26, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 14:18, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTNEWS; earthquakes happen every day, and this one is certainly not a notable one -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 14:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 4.0 is all? More women in Texas need to take off their tops. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:59, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not enough coverage to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:NOTNEWS. P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 15:16, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 4.0? No damage? Meh. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 16:01, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not every earthshaking event is an earthshaking event. Mandsford (talk) 18:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delte per WP:NOTNEWS. I couldn't find it, but aren't there specific notability guidelines for earthquakes? I recall seeing that mentioned after the Haiti earthquake.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 20:27, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I am the article's creator, and although the magnitude is 4.0, earthquakes of any magnitude in South Texas are rare, and the ones that do happen are rarely felt and are rarely of this magnitude. The fact that it was felt and occurred in an area where earthquakes rarely occur means it is notable and should be kept.Av9 (talk) 21:28, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There would be nothing wrong with writing a general article about earthquakes in Texas. Atypical events can, collectively, be the subject of a Wikipedia article, such as List of snow events in Florida. Mandsford (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Yet another non-notable earthquake. Justmeagain83 (talk) 03:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTNEWS Traxs7 (Talk) 05:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. While it's not unambiguously notable, there's enough press coverage to suggest it qualifies as marginally notable. Everyking (talk) 03:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NOTNEWS covers it. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.